About Me

Name: Jay Mack
Location: Chicago, WI
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What is Racism?

---Slavery and slaves came to America via a European and African conspiracy to capture, enslave and transport victim tribes to the New World. It thrived in European Colonial America.  
---When the American Constitution was signed, slavery was a stumbling block. THe Constitution would not have been signed if slavery was mentioned, so the issue was deferred. But it was never accepted and the issue festered for 80 years, one lifetime, until the North and South fought a war over it. The North, the caucasians, America, liberated the slaves. It didn't enslave them.
---'Racism' is not really a word. It has no specific meaning and is commonly applied to language differences as well as racial differences. It just evokes a reaction and is used for blackmail. Either you give me what I want, politically, or I'll call you a 'racist.'
---The word is used to keep aliens flowing illegially from Mexico into the Democrat party, because if you try to control the borders, you're a 'racist.' Haven't Americans - meaning African Americans, Native Americans and Caucasian Americans - a right to their own country?
---The word is 'biggot.' Many people are biggots. But biggotry does not explain a continuing political or economic situation. No group has been a greater victim of biggotry than the Jews, yet the Jews thrive despite biggotry. If African Americans believe that they are at a political or economic disadvantage, they need to look beyond biggotry for the solution, because what one thinks about another isn't the cause of the others' success or failure. Whether or not biggotry is evil, it is a thought and freedom should allow men their thoughts.
---Blacks and Latinos are allowed their thoughts. They can be as biggoted as they choose to be, but they are somehow absolved from charges of biggotry or 'racism.' Why are Caucasians the only 'racists'?
---Those who think America is 'racist' need to look at the larger world. Do they think there is no biggotry among Latinos? THink again. Do they think there is no biggotry in Africa? Think again. In China? In Japan? There too. In Africa, one Black tribe hates and kills another it considers inferior.
---African American's have paid a large price for biggotry in terms of economic and political prejudice and even lynching. Thank goodness for Dr. King. But Americans in general and America specifically has never been a conspiracy of 'Racists.' Until possibly now.
---The charge of 'racist' is like the charge of 'witch' or 'heretic.' It is a hate crime, in my opinion, blackmail, and should not be tolerated. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Not an African American Justice from Obama?

As to where the continuing racism exists in America, please either ask or answer the question as to why President Obama did not nominate an African American for the Supreme Court. Will someone please ask that question? Why did he choose Judge Sotomayor?

President Obama is the First African American president of the United States. Why in the world then wouldn’t he choose an African American? That is part of what he was elected to do. One wonders whether he feels that Justice Thomas, who is a Republican and shares almost no political philosophy with the larger African American community, is token Black enough? Does he feel that it isn’t the African Americans’ turn yet? Could he find no African American qualified for the banc? Obviously, none of these answers satisfies. What was his thinking?

By nominating a Latino rather than an African American, Obama as an individual and as a Democrat has once more delayed and denied the empowerment of the African Americans who in large measure elected him, relied upon him and had placed their hopes and aspirations with him and the Democrats. Democrats had promised, again and again, a place at the table for African Americans, and again that promise was ignored. Is ‘Next time’ a satisfactory answer?

African Americans have been waiting for a place at the table for 200 or 300 years. Latinos for maybe 25. Latinos are not a disparaged or discriminated against minority. Latinos have never been lynched, or told to sit on the back of the bus. They do not descend from slaves. They just came to America voluntarily and appear to be doing well. They seem to get many of the highway and other jobs from the stimulus package. I never see an African American working on the road. I can’t think of anything that African Americans have gotten from the stimulus package.

Why did the First African American President of the United States not nominate an African American? The question is not posed by anyone, not Jesse Jackson, not Rangel, not Rush, not what’s-his-name. Not anyone.

I want an answer to that question. I think it was a very calculated decision, very cynical, and the only answer I can come up with is very disconcerting.

President Obama seems to be simply isolating Caucasians. He is confident that he will not lose Blacks who elected and trust in him. But he ignored the aspirations and hopes of African Americans by side stepping them once again and no one is calling him on it.

President Obama apparently picked Judge Sotomayor because of her ruling in the Ricci case. He seems to approve of her summary dismissal of the White firefighters. He seems to have picked her because he wants a Latino justice on the court to isolate Caucasians and she was the best tool he had in his shed for that purpose. African American empowerment did not enter into his decision. Frankly, I’m not sure Obama even considers himself an African American. I’m not sure he gives a darn about African Americans.

I live in a predominantly, but certainly not exclusively, Caucasian community. I work in a very integrated environment. With few exceptions and none that I have witnessed in decades, Caucasians do not exhibit bigotry in their lives, words or actions. As I see it, the source of continuing racism is from those that seek to profit by it, use the term as blackmail, and keep it alive for political and journalistic purposes.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »